Monet's
Waterlilies
Robert
Hayden
Today
as the news from Selma and Saigon
poisons the air like fallout,
I come again to see
the serene, great picture that I love.
Here space and time exist in light
the eye like the eye of faith believes.
The seen, the known
dissolve in iridescence, become
illusive flesh of light
that was not, was, forever is.
O light beheld as through refracting tears.
Here is the aura of that world
each of us has lost.
Here is the shadow of its joy.
poisons the air like fallout,
I come again to see
the serene, great picture that I love.
Here space and time exist in light
the eye like the eye of faith believes.
The seen, the known
dissolve in iridescence, become
illusive flesh of light
that was not, was, forever is.
O light beheld as through refracting tears.
Here is the aura of that world
each of us has lost.
Here is the shadow of its joy.
In my office, I have this poem printed out and
hanging on my pinboard. It was one of
the first personal touches I added when I arrived in the stark little basement
room to start my new job. I wrote about
this poem my senior year of college, focusing especially on the line that I am
still convinced is one of the more beautiful ever crafted in the English
language: “The eye like the eye of faith believes.”
Today, though, as I flipped over to the New York
Times website to take a quick break from a project, that was not the line that
came to me. Today, it is the news from
Boston that poisons the air like fallout, and I had a sudden need to “come
again to see / the serene, great picture that I love.”
My serene great picture is a symbolist painting of
an orchard. I’m a Mannerist fan by
preference and a Modernist student by trade (trade being a very, very loose
term), but this particular painting is intensely important to me. After I left my museum job for a graduate
program, and realized graduate school sucks, I found myself on a regular basis
trudging downstairs to the mental health services department at my university. I had thought that the Boulder air would be
like one of those Victorian spas—it would cure me of all ill-humors and
palpitations. When it didn’t turn out
like that, I made my way back to therapy.
In the lower level of the health services building,
they had a small, low quality reproduction of that orchard painting. I had liked it before I left the museum but
hadn’t paid much attention to it. It was
actually kind of ubiquitous: we used it on some of the promotional materials in
my department. In grad school, far from
the place I had belatedly realized was home, missing my job and my life in
Boston, that painting came to stand for the things I missed. I’ll admit: I would do some combination of
pouting and/or sighing whenever I walked by that reproduction. It became the shadow of my joy.
Through no small amount of luck, I actually ended up
going back to the same museum to a different job after I graduated (though,
admittedly, four months and a case of shingles occurred in the interim). Now, when I’m having a rough day, or I just
need a break, I go and visit that painting.
It’s not as huge as Monet’s painting at the MoMA, to which Hayden is
referring, but it is serene, and it is great, and I love it.
And I needed it today.
What I found when I flipped over to the NYT website
was that the Boston bomber had been given the death penalty. When the bombs went off two years ago, I was
in Boulder, but I felt my heart crack.
That Friday, when the city was on lockdown and the streets were eerily
empty, I watched through the news at a distance. I was so distracted that I came clean with
the classes I taught that day: “My hometown is on lock down. I’m no good to anybody right now.”
In the last several months as the trial has
proceeded, I’ve heard about it almost every morning on NPR. It’s odd to me to think that the trial has
been a part of my morning routine since before the city was pounded by blizzard
after blizzard—a succession of arctic Mondays—and now through to apple trees
blooming and lilacs going gangbusters. I
don’t know why I thought the penalty verdict would take longer in coming, but I
was taken aback when I saw the headline.
I didn’t bother finishing the article, but stood up, went upstairs to
the galleries, and stood in front of my painting, shoulders hunched forward and
trying to keep a straight face.
I’m one of the thousands—probably millions—of people
on the outskirts of the Boston bombing. I’ve
written about how extremely lucky I was that all of my people were safe, and
that I was able to get a hold of them immediately. I make no claims to the caliber of loss that
so many people have had to endure.
Still, as someone who loves Boston—and goddamn, I love this city—the bombing
touched my life, and now, so has this verdict.
I don’t support the death penalty. That’s such a broad statement to make, but it’s
true. In addition to the irrefutable
fact that the justice system is not infallible, and is in fact in many cases
deeply broken, I really just don’t believe that there is any justice in taking
a life as the punishment for taking a life, or lives. It’s a gross tautology. And as the parents of one victim pointed out,
the death penalty appeals and ongoing coverage will keep him in the news and those
wounds open so much longer than if they had locked him up and thrown away the
key.
So often, it feels like the air is poisoned, that we are surrounded by such senseless, systemic
violence. Or worse, that the “sense”
people use to rationalize violence is horribly perverted, that they think the
system is somehow adequately self-justifying.
I try to think of what it feels like—“the aura of that world each of us
has lost”—and sometimes it’s really hard to come up with.
I don’t have any articulate conclusions. I haven’t really learned anything among my
ruminations on Robert Hayden, paintings of orchards, and death penalty
verdicts. It’s a fucking mess.
The eye of faith may believe, but sometimes the heart
has a really hard time reconciling it all.
No comments:
Post a Comment